t is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than
for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God (Matt.19:24).
"Who then can be saved?" It was a poignant question
raised by the disciples in response to the parable Jesus tells of a camel trying to get
through the eye of a needle. But I am getting ahead of the story, because the context of
this parable is critical.
The rich, young ruler
Our narrative begins when a rich young man respectfully approaches our Lord Jesus
Christ and asks him: "Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal
life?" (Matt. 19:16). We would all like to know the answer to this question. The
inquiry was apparently made in all sincerity and Jesus treats the question most seriously,
obviously knowing the "heart" of this young, rich, ruler (see also Luke
18:18).
From the immediate response of our Lord Jesus -- "Why callest
thou me good?" -- we get a hint of the problem this young man failed to
appreciate. The Greek word rendered "good" in most English language
versions seems to imply "intrinsic worthiness" as distinguished from
mere outward appearance and all three Gospel writers use identical language. Jesus objects
to being called "good" in this perfect sense, reserving this
designation only for the Lord God, his Father.
A good, young man
Here is the crux of the issue -- it appears that the young man thought that perfect
goodness could be achieved by man by virtue of his own actions, apart from the grace of
God. Hence his request asking what "good" thing he could do to,
in a sense, "earn" eternal life. The young mans emphasis is
clearly on his own actions (thinking typical of Pharisees).
The term ruler in this context is usually one referring to a "magistrate."
That one so young would be entrusted to an office of such responsibility gives us a hint
of the upright character that this lad must have shown. The seriousness of our Lords
response confirms further the just character of the youth.
Considering the commandments
Working from the rulers own premise, Jesus gives a simple, direct answer to the
question -- "Keep the commandments." The young man, with no apparent
guile, asks further, "Which?" (The Luke and Mark versions omit this
question, but Matthew was an eyewitness to the event and included this important detail.)
Again this hints of the possible Pharisee in the lad: the need to precisely define in
exact detail what, and what not to do, is characteristic of the actions of a legalistic
mind.
Yet our Lord does not lose his patience but spells out several
commandments with emphasis on those from the second tablet of the Law of Moses. These all
focus our relationship with our fellow human beings. One should not assume that Jesus was
omitting others because they were not as important. In another context, our Lord Jesus
guides a "certain lawyer" to confess: "Thou shalt love the
Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and
with all thy mind; and thy neighbor as thyself" (Luke 10:27). Given the obvious
sincerity of purpose and real yearning for eternal life that this young ruler had
displayed in coming to Christ in the first place, it is probable our Lord realized that
the lad, beyond a doubt, believed he loved the Father with all his heart, soul, strength
and mind. Thus that side of the law did not have to be reiterated.
What then was the young mans weakness? The Psalmist tells us,
"If riches increase, set not your heart upon them" (Psa. 62:10).
Dealing with critical weakness
Jesus knew where this mans heart really resided. He had great riches and they
possessed his heart, soul, strength and mind. When an illness possesses our bodies the
only way to free us from it is to get rid of all the infection. The Lord did not make a
general practice that everyone had to give up 100% in order to be his disciple. Zacchaeus
the publican whom we shortly meet in chapter 19 of Luke gave up 50% of his riches and this
appears to be well pleasing. This young man wanted to be "perfect"
(Matt. 19:21) and this clearly was not possible.
Jesus uses the innermost thoughts of this young man to demonstrate that
no matter how good any of us think we are, yet within all of us are weaknesses. We have to
realize this and let go of those things within us that separate us from being more
faithful followers of our Lord Jesus Christ. It may be our possessions, just as with this
young ruler. It may be our time which we are unwilling to give to His service. It may be
some flaw in our character, which we refuse to confront and control. But while we
certainly need to mold ourselves more fully in the character of our Lord Jesus, the bottom
line is our lives are a work in process and our own actions, regardless of how good we
are, will not earn us so great a reward as eternal life. We obviously need a different
approach than our own goodness.
The young man could not bear this response; giving up all his wealth
was never an option that he contemplated. What is it that prevents us from completely
following Jesus? What is it that we refuse to give up? Sad to say it is often the cares of
this world and sheer laziness that cause us to stumble. How many of us have been too tired
to go to meeting or Bible class, but would have dragged ourselves to work if that had been
necessary?
Parable of camel
With sadness Jesus watches the young man walk away, for Jesus "loved"
him (Mk. 10:21). "Then Jesus said to his disciples, I tell you the truth,
it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven" (Matt 19:23
NIV). This statement astonished the disciples. In the Jewish world of the first century,
riches in this life were considered a "sign" of the blessing of God. If
a person so blessed was to be excluded from the kingdom of God, what chance did anyone
else have? It is in this setting that Jesus tells this parable: "Indeed, it is
easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the
kingdom of God" (Luke 18:25 NIV).
The parable clearly paints a ludicrous picture. Why? Was it for comic
relief to tone down a very tense moment? Probably not; our Lord Jesus Christ was a Master
teacher (see earlier, at verse 16 of Matthew 19, among others) and now saw the opportunity
to teach a very important lesson in a way that would never be forgotten. The lesson has
apparently stuck, for many who have only the barest acquaintance with the Bible have heard
of this parable. The comic juxtaposition of a camel trying to get through the eye of a
sewing needle is a word picture that is easily remembered. But what does it mean?
Not needle gate
Some have attempted to give this image an interpretation that Jesus did not literally
mean a sewing needle, but instead referred to the so-called Needle Gate into
the city of Jerusalem. This gate was the smallest gate into the city and, because easily
defended, was kept open later than any of the main entries. Hence, a merchant with a camel
laden with goods could enter the city after curfew through this gate. The narrowness and
low height of the so-called Needle Gate might require the merchant to unburden the worldly
goods from the beast and even necessitate the animal to lower itself to crawl through the
portal. The analogy is obvious, that if one wished to enter through the eye of the needle
(gate), one had to drop the burden of worldly goods and humble oneself to crawl through
the opening.
While this interpretation is an interesting possibility, I do not think
that this is what Jesus intended for us to take from this parable. First of all, the
indefinite article "a" is used instead of the definite article "the."
The parable says "the eye of a needle" not the
"eye of the needle."
Jesus must have been thoroughly aware of the layout of the city of
Jerusalem and this lack of specificity could not have been an oversight. Furthermore, the
Gospel was written not only for the people of the first century AD, but also for all ages
including those who would have little, if any, knowledge of ancient Jerusalem.
Finally, the needle gate idea, while engaging, seems to somewhat
miss the point of the parable. That interpretation implies that we can get through the eye
of the needle (gate) by our own volition. All we have to do is become less worldly
and more humble. Obviously there is nothing wrong with striving not to be consumed by this
worlds material benefits, nor can we go wrong by trying to be more humble. But the
mistake is thinking that we can earn admission to the kingdom of God by our
actions. The scriptures make it clear that salvation is not by works, but by grace. "For
the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our
Lord" (Rom 6:23). One cannot earn a gift (eternal life), but we do deserve our
wages (death) which are just recompense for what we are and what we do. This is a
difficult lesson to learn and it was one that astonished the disciples.
A needle is appropriate
The disciples, who were brought up in Jewish culture of that time, thought that riches
in this life were surely a sign of blessing from the heavenly Father. For Jesus to say "that
a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven" (Matt. 19:23) must
have totally bewildered them, as the text makes clear by using the superlative "they
were exceedingly amazed" (v. 25).
Hence this funny, ludicrous parable serves a double purpose. First,
like any good funny image it is indeed easy to remember, but also the juxtaposition of the
camel and the eye of a needle clearly poses an impossible feat. How can the camel ever
hope to get through it? The answer Jesus gives is crystal-clear -- it is not by action on
our part that will gain us the kingdom of heaven, but only through the power and grace of
the Lord God: "With men this is impossible; but with God all things are
possible" (v. 27).
There is a danger which inherently blocks the full understanding of
this powerful parabolic image of the "camel and the needle." We are
prone to an extreme that says essentially: if it is all by grace what does it matter what
I do? Therefore once I have come to a perfect knowledge of salvation, my moral behavior is
irrelevant. In the words of the Apostle Paul, "God forbid"! This is
exactly the wrong thinking that Paul refutes in his letter to the Romans (see especially
Rom. 3:31) and that James also denounces when he wrote "faith without works is
dead" (James 2:26).
The fact of the matter is that we must try our very best, always
realizing that we have nothing to boast about. Neither should we get discouraged or ever
give up, for as long as we strive to do our best the Lord will carry us the rest of the
way. Even as Peter could say that the disciples had forsaken all to follow Christ, yet
later they all fled and he would be the same who would vehemently deny him. Even so it
will be with us, we will have moments of strength and times of incredible weakness. Yet
when strong, we should not be arrogant, nor when weak, should we despair: "Fear
not, little flock; for it is your Fathers good pleasure to give you the
kingdom" (Luke 12:32), for with Him the impossible becomes possible.
John C. Bilello