|
DEVOTIONAL - The Way to the Father (2) Once Peter has heard the words of Jesus, “If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me” (John 13:8), he goes to the other extreme and exclaims, “Lord, not my feet only, but also my hands and my head.” Life away from his Lord is the very last thing he desires. The Lord reassures his follower, “He that is bathed needeth not save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit: and ye are all clean, but not all” (v. 10). This is plainly a reference to Judas, but oblique in character. The Lord therefore regards the apostles as clean, with one exception. Cleansed
by the Word A notable experience in Peter’s life was to bring home to him the meaning of the world “clean.” Referring to the momentous events associated with the conversion of Cornelius and his circle (recorded in Acts 10), Peter later declared: God “made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith” (Acts 15:9)1. Thus faith, issuing in implicit obedience, has at all times been the ground of acceptance in God’s sight. More
to discipleship than faith In case they demur at the thought of washing each other’s feet, Jesus stresses the importance of the lesson given: “Verily, verily, [notice the solemnity] I say unto you, a servant is not greater than his lord; neither one that is sent greater than he that sent him” (v. 16). For his own part, as one sent by his Father, he had faithfully carried out his Father’s will and was soon to do so in the most challenging of circumstances; now, in their capacity as those chosen sent by him (cf. Matt. 10:5), they should carry out his instructions. Knowledge
must be followed by action As he utters the words, the Lord is conscious there is one for whom they are meaningless: “I speak not of you all: I know whom I have chosen” (v. 18). He has looked into the heart of Judas, and as the moment of betrayal draws nearer, he feels increasingly the need to disclose the identity of the traitor. But still, at this stage, the language is veiled. However, he quotes Psalm 41:9, in which there is a prophetic message, foretelling the base deed. “He that eateth my bread lifted up his heel against me.” Commentators have here seen a reference to Ahithophel, who, having been the king’s counselor, joined Absalom’s conspiracy against David3. The Lord makes one fact clear: this late revelation of the traitor’s identity is to show his foreknowledge of events before they come to pass and thus to fortify the apostles’ faith in him (John 13:19). The next verse may at first sight seem strange at this juncture. “Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that receiveth whomsoever I send receiveth me; and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me” (v. 20). Here Jesus is indicating the authority he is investing in the apostles. They will be his representatives and emissaries after he leaves them to go to the Father. Ample evidence of their activities is furnished in the book of Acts. However, his action in commissioning them would be meaningless if he were not himself the representative and emissary of the Father. Thus the authority of the Gospel preached by the Lord and his apostles derives from God Himself. (See Acts 1:7-8). Jesus’
relationship with his apostles Apart from the traitor, the words cause surprise, pain and consternation. Who possibly among them could be guilty of so base a deed? They look at one another in disbelief. Typically, Peter will not rest until the mystery is resolved. The beloved disciple, none other than John himself, is reclining in the Lord’s bosom. Peter beckons to him, to attract his attention, and asks him to question the Lord (v. 24). Leaning back onto his Lord’s bosom, John, doubtless in a whisper, asks: “Lord, who is it?” (v. 25). Jesus chooses to respond by dipping a sop and giving it to Judas Iscariot. The latter, who has been alerted by the earlier words of our Lord, “one of you shall betray me,” begins to suspect that his dark secret has been penetrated. “That
thou doest, do quickly” We must surely marvel at our Lord’s wonderful self-control. Hitherto, the knowledge of Judas’ perfidy has been locked in his bosom, and ample opportunity has been given to Judas to amend his ways. It is only after he has entered into a compact with the Jewish authorities that the Lord reveals what Judas is doing. Even after the traitor’s departure, all save Peter and John are unaware of the import of the Lord’s final words to Judas, imagining in their innocence that Jesus instructed him to make some purchases on their behalf or to give something to the poor (v. 30). John’s record of the incident closes thus: “He then having received the sop went out straightway: and it was night” (v. 30). Night indeed it was. Tom Barling Footnotes: 1 Peter, who received the vision of the clean and unclean animals, had the insight to perceive it related not to animals but also to human beings; Gentiles, regarded by orthodox Jews as unclean, could on the basis of faith in Jesus Christ become clean in God’s sight. 2 Using a different Greek word, Peter reminds us Jesus has left us an “example” – “that we should follow his steps” (1 Peter 2:21). 3
In his “Undesigned Coincidences,”
J. J. Blunt considers the motives which moved Ahithophel to act against
David; he comments: “…when David murdered Uriah, he murdered
Ahithophel’s grandson by marriage, and when he corrupted Bathsheba,
he corrupted his grand-daughter by blood” (London, 1859, p.
136). |
|